I used to think that the MORE time I spent painting-actually
physically working
hard was in direct proportion to how much MORE I learned and
improved my work.
Working hard is something I have forced myself to get good
at but now I think that maybe this was not such a good thing to
get good at after all. Listening to the
poet philosopher David Whyte speaking in San Francisco a couple of years ago I
jotted something down in my sketchbook that he said regarding learning. He was
talking more metaphorically, probably larger in terms of learning from our life
– how to live, rather than art making, but it resonated with me. It was a quick sentence and at the time I didn’t
really understand, so I wrote it down so later I would. He said, “…Visitation, absence,
visitation, absence, visitation, absence, (this repeated over and over again)
is how we learn.” In other words the
time BETWEEN the periods of effort, the pauses in-between are fundamentally as
important as the periods of work. He believes that this “on, off and on again “ process produces
more consistent, more substantial results. This is true for me too. Does this
resonate with how you learn?
I teach a 7-dayworkshop every year at Esalen. This is an amazing opportunity for people to
spend an unbroken week just focusing on their art. The improvement is
extraordinary. However I also teach a 6 week, 3 hours per week Artful Life ongoing course in my studio. What I am seeing, amazingly is that these
students, even though they are only working 3 hours a week are also improving
at an amazing rate. What I think is happening is that even though they are not
physically painting they are nonetheless still THINKING about principles they
have learned. Examples of color, value, composition all begin to creep into
their everyday life and as a result their visual sensitivity increases. I see a
marked improvement when they come to class the 2nd and 3rd
time, even though they have NOT been painting. Miraculously they just have improved.
So maybe, and I am mostly needing to tell myself this, we
don’t need to work harder, but instead just put the brushes in the can of
turpentine and go away for the afternoon. Suddenly, in the name of improving my
work, bird watching, maybe collecting driftwood or even playing bocce ball all suddenly
seem relevant.
Visitation, Absence, visitation, absence. I think I am going
to like this new way of working.
The photograph was taken following my daughter Lyla, 19 on the final ascent of "Clouds Rest" a nine thousand ft. peak in Yosemite National Park.
1 comment:
I get some of my best work done while doing laundry, baking cakes, cleaning my garage, or watching movies on Netfliks. I believe this so strongly that I pretty much consider it a part of my creative process.
When I was much younger I thought that to be a real artist, I had to be working all the time. Whenever I wasn’t in the studio for a week or so I felt guilty. I now see this thinking as absurdly flawed. Discipline is one thing, but working hard ALL the time doesn’t guarantee that the art will be better---it does however offer the possibility that you will end up miserable.
Finding the right rhythm of work and “down time” has been an important part of learning how to become better at creating the paintings I want to make.
I consider myself lucky that it only took me 10 years to understand this.
Post a Comment